Expanding local species for agricultural use is suggested because it could?

• A. Harm biodiversity and reduce livelihoods
• B. Help improve biodiversity and expand livelihoods
• C. Have no impact on biodiversity
• D. Require foreign investment

Answer: (B)

Expanding locally adapted species for farming hinges on diversity and resilience. Using crops and varieties that are native or well-suited to the local environment boosts biodiversity by increasing the variety of plants, supporting a wider range of insects, soil microbes, and other ecosystem services. At the same time, it strengthens livelihoods because a greater mix of crops reduces risk from pests, drought, or market changes, and often lowers input costs since local varieties are better adapted to local conditions. This combination—healthier ecosystems and more options for farmers—leads to both biodiversity gains and expanded livelihoods.

The idea isn’t about harming biodiversity, and it isn’t about having no impact. It also doesn’t inherently require foreign investment or depend on it as a necessary condition.